Verification
Three views of the same question: is the asset behind the token what the issuer says it is, and how do we know?
The asset exists and is what the issuer says it is.
Evidence read from the primary record: land registry, vault ledger, corporate register, concession file.
VORUNEX reads the record itself where the registry allows it (source rank 1). Where it cannot, an independent professional's report (rank 2) or a third-party attestation (rank 3) stands in, and the passport says which.
Every claim about the asset has a strength.
An eight-axis profile of how strongly each score category is evidenced, drawn from the category points.
Points are earned per criterion and lost when evidence expires. The radar on each passport is the same eight axes as the RWA Score, so nothing is hidden inside a single number.
What the issuer states against what was verified.
A ledger that pairs each claim with its evidence and shows it as Verified, Reported, Cannot be confirmed, Not available or Sources disagree, each with the sentence that says who stands behind it.
The gap is the set of claims without rank 1 or rank 2 evidence. It is published on every passport and feeds the Watchtower rules for evidence expiry.
Every piece of evidence carries the rank of who read it. Rank 1 is the strongest.
Evidence states: Verified, Partially verified, Unverified, Contradicted, Expired. Expired evidence lowers the category points until it is renewed.
No asset with published claims is on the public record yet.
